In response to the recent developments, Friends of the Parks released a statement on Tuesday, calling attention to what they view as an apparent rush by the Bears to formulate a new plan after previously signaling intentions to depart the city for an "entertainment district" project. The group emphasized the need for thorough discussions, especially considering the significant public investment and potential impact on Chicago's landscape and neighborhoods.
The Bears' recent shift in focus from Arlington Heights to a new stadium within the city has further stirred the debate. The team's commitment to investing over $2 billion in a publicly-owned domed stadium near Soldier Field, coupled with plans to enhance open spaces in the vicinity, has garnered attention. Bears President and CEO Kevin Warren highlighted the transformative potential of the future stadium, emphasizing its economic benefits and contribution to community enjoyment.
Despite acknowledging the nod to open space in the Bears' announcement, Friends of the Parks underscored the absence of a clear vision for the proposed entertainment district. The group suggested exploring alternative locations for development, such as the Michael Reese site, which could offer a balanced approach by combining state-of-the-art facilities with residential and business districts while preserving lakefront views.
In anticipation of potential backlash, Friends of the Parks emphasized their commitment to engaging in constructive dialogue with stakeholders, including the Bears, to explore creative solutions that align with the community's interests and uphold the integrity of Chicago's cherished lakefront.
POLL | ||
12 MARS | 114 ANSWERS A Chicago parks group voices its 'frustration' regarding the Chicago Bears' stadium proposal. Are you happy with the new plan for the Bears' stadium? | ||
Yes | 77 | 67.5 % |
No | 37 | 32.5 % |
List of polls |