Advantages and disadvantages of each potential Bears offensive coordinator candidate
The Chicago Bears are diligently searching for their next offensive coordinator for the 2024 season. Since parting ways with Luke Getsy following a lackluster 2023 season, they have conducted interviews or expressed interest in nine candidates, ranging from seasoned offensive assistants like Greg Olson to promising college coordinators like Liam Coen.
Head coach Matt Eberflus and general manager Ryan Poles are leaving no stone unturned in their quest to find the ideal candidate who can maximize the potential of an offense facing a significant decision at the quarterback position. While each candidate possesses unique strengths, none of them are without their drawbacks.
In situations as pivotal as this, it's often beneficial to compile a list of pros and cons for each candidate. Here's a breakdown of the positives and negatives associated with each known candidate:
Shane Waldron:
Pros: Successfully developed offenses tailored to various quarterback styles, from traditional pocket passers to mobile quarterbacks.Cons: Struggled as a playcaller in Seattle during the 2023 season, with the Seahawks' offense regressing significantly.
Klint Kubiak:
Pros: Thrived as a playcaller with the Vikings in 2021, played a role in the development of quarterback Brock Purdy in 2023.Cons: Encountered conflicts with former head coach Mike Zimmer and was part of the underperforming 2022 Broncos.
Liam Coen:
Pros: Adaptable coach capable of working with both college and veteran NFL quarterbacks, demonstrated success at Kentucky in 2021 and 2023.Cons: Oversaw a dramatic decline in the Rams' offense during his tenure as offensive coordinator in 2022, raising questions about his readiness for the NFL.
Greg Olson:
Pros: A seasoned coach with a track record of success across multiple teams and eras, known for getting the best out of quarterbacks.Cons: Lacks innovation in offensive schemes, potentially limiting long-term success, and may be better suited for a quarterbacks coach role.
Greg Roman:
Pros: Specializes in crafting high-powered offenses around mobile quarterbacks, previously guided Colin Kaepernick and Lamar Jackson to success.Cons: Compatibility issues with rookie quarterbacks, players' dissatisfaction with his offensive system, and potential pigeonholing at the quarterback position.
Zac Robinson:
Pros: Regarded as a rising star from the Sean McVay coaching tree, credited with contributing to the Rams' offensive resurgence.Cons: Lack of experience as a playcaller at the NFL level, which poses a risk for a team in need of offensive stability.
Marcus Brady:
Pros: Familiarity with head coach Matt Eberflus and previous success coordinating the offense during Jonathan Taylor's breakout season.Cons: Limited NFL playcalling experience and association with the Marc Trestman coaching tree may not win favor with fans.
Thomas Brown:
Pros: Strong background in the run game, having coached prominent college running backs, and experience as a run-game coordinator.Cons: Struggled as the Panthers' offensive coordinator in 2023, overseeing a significant decline in offensive production.
Selecting the right offensive coordinator is a critical decision for the Chicago Bears, and weighing these pros and cons will undoubtedly play a crucial role in their choice.
| POLL | ||
22 JANVIER | 61 ANSWERS Advantages and disadvantages of each potential Bears offensive coordinator candidate Should the Bears keep Matt Eberflus? | ||
| yes | 26 | 42.6 % |
| no | 35 | 57.4 % |
| List of polls | ||
