Just a year ago, Bengals GM Duke Tobin firmly shut down any talks of trading Higgins, emphasizing his importance to the team. However, recent developments suggest a shift in perspective.
Despite placing the franchise tag on Higgins, Tobin hasn't ruled out the possibility of a trade. With the Bengals facing financial constraints and considering the long-term implications of their roster, Higgins could become expendable.
While Tobin expressed a desire to retain Higgins, he acknowledged the complexities of securing a long-term deal. The NFL landscape is ever-changing, and balancing player contracts within the constraints of the Collective Bargaining Agreement presents challenges.
For the Bears, who are in need of depth at wide receiver beyond DJ Moore, Higgins could represent a valuable addition. With ample cap space following a significant increase, Chicago could explore acquiring Higgins and extending his contract, potentially alongside locking down Jaylon Johnson.
Investing in Higgins, along with Moore, could eat into a substantial portion of the Bears' cap space, limiting their ability to pursue other high-priced signings. However, with a rookie quarterback expected to join the team, the Bears have the flexibility to allocate funds strategically, prioritizing offensive weapons to support their young signal-caller's development.
While the Bengals may prefer to retain Higgins, the harsh realities of NFL roster management may force them into difficult decisions. Should Cincinnati entertain offers for Higgins, the Bears are well-positioned to inquire about his availability and negotiate a deal to secure his services for the foreseeable future.
POLL | ||
29 FEVRIER | 17 ANSWERS As the Bengals reassess Tee Higgins' future, is there potential for the Bears to pursue the wide receiver? Should the Bears sign a WR in free agency? | ||
yes | 9 | 52.9 % |
No | 8 | 47.1 % |
List of polls |