The choices made by the Bears raise concerns for the future of their quarterbacks, whether it's Justin Fields or Caleb Williams.
The Chicago Bears have provided an initial response to the many uncertainties of the offseason by opting to retain head coach Matt Eberflus while parting ways with offensive coordinator Luke Getsy and several offensive staff members. This decision reflects the franchise's hesitancy to take bold steps, perpetuating a recurring cycle of losing due to misalignment between the general manager, coach, and quarterback.
While Eberflus remains in place, the spotlight now shifts to the impending quarterback decision. The Bears must decide whether to stick with Justin Fields or explore other options, such as drafting Caleb Williams or Drake Maye with the No. 1 overall pick.
Retaining Eberflus can be interpreted in two ways: as a sign of commitment to Fields or as a strategic move to accommodate a potential new quarterback. If Fields is retained, it's likely because Eberflus needs to deliver results in 2024, and Fields offers the best chance for success.
On the other hand, some may view the decision to retain Eberflus as an indication of the Bears' intention to draft a quarterback at No. 1 overall. This would provide an enticing proposition for a sought-after offensive coordinator, offering a lifeline to Eberflus for a two-year window of improvement with a rookie quarterback, regardless of the win-loss record in Year 1.
The moves made on Wednesday can be seen as a Rorschach Test, reflecting differing perspectives on Fields and his future in Chicago. Supporters of Fields may interpret the firing of Getsy but retention of Eberflus as an acknowledgment that the system, rather than the quarterback, was the issue. Conversely, skeptics may see it as a sign that the Bears plan to overhaul the entire offense, quarterback included.
Common wisdom suggests that the decision to overhaul most of the offensive staff while keeping Eberflus could signal the end of Fields' tenure in Chicago. Fields has faced challenges, and despite showing improvement late in the season, he hasn't solidified his position as the undisputed franchise quarterback. Fields' parting words with the media after the season-ending loss to the Green Bay Packers also raised questions about his future.
The Bears' ability to attract a highly sought-after offensive coordinator this offseason remains uncertain due to Eberflus' precarious position. Most coordinators prioritize stability and multiple years to succeed, making the Bears' offer less appealing. Additionally, a new offensive coordinator would mean Fields' third offensive system in four seasons, posing significant challenges.
The Bears' best selling point to attract a quality offensive coordinator might be their ownership of the No. 1 overall pick and the opportunity to develop a talent like Caleb Williams or Drake Maye. This prospect could entice an up-and-coming coordinator looking to make a name for themselves.
In all likelihood, Fields will play elsewhere in 2024. However, the Bears' unconventional decision-making history leaves room for uncertainty. Whether they stick with Fields or draft a new quarterback, they have created an arduous task for their franchise quarterback. Fields would have to adapt to a third system or a rookie quarterback would join a coaching staff with an uncertain future, repeating past mistakes.
Regardless of the outcome, the Bears face a challenging road ahead, searching for a formula for success that has eluded them for decades.
